Frontstage and Backstage Ethics in Mental Health: A Qualitative Case
Study
Emily M. Sweitzer
Abstract
This qualitative study attempted to examine the ethical principles of
autonomy and confidentiality
and their applications among the daily work activities of mental health
case managers. The
philosophical concepts of Utilitarianism and Deontology were also
examined as justifications for
the case managers’ applications of treatment. For the purpose of this
study, a qualitative
interview was conducted with three, mental health, intensive case
managers to ascertain their
individual perceptions and applications of autonomy and confidentiality.
Observations of case
manager team meetings and reviews of several agency policies were also
conducted. All data
were then analyzed for thematic content. The emerging themes consisted
of: daily havoc,
confidentiality is contextual, autonomy is relative and is manipulated,
and protection. These
themes suggest that the application of autonomy and confidentiality are
directly influenced by
contexts, policies, values, and behaviors. This study should be
beneficial to health care
practitioners for the purpose of recognizing the dynamic role of context
and its’ influence on client
health care and therapeutic management.
Full Article